HRHF statement on the adoption of Russia’s UPR

Human Rights House Foundation delivered the following statement during the adoption of Russia’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR) at the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC39). This statement enjoys the support of two Russian human rights organisations.

During Russia’s Previous review in 2013, its restrictive legislation on freedom of assembly and association was heavily criticized. This legislation has subsequently demonstrated its destructive potential, illustrated in our joint written submission under the UPR.

Since its second review, Russia has received numerous authoritative international assessments of its legislation, echoing the criticism it received in its review under the UPR, including those by the Council of Europe’s Commissioner for Human Rights, the Venice Commission, UN treaty bodies and special procedures.

Nevertheless, Russia continues to deny that these legal provisions are in violation of international standards and takes no steps to remedy the situation. In fact, Russia continues to introduce new restrictive norms, including inter alia, the law on “undesirable organizations”, thus widening the toolbox for suppressing independent civil society. Such examples include:

  • 2014 legislation on public rallies, further limiting the freedom of peaceful assembly, with contraventions resulting in fines of up to one million roubles, and up to five years in prison;
  • A policy by the Ministry of Justice, since 2016, to press the courts to dissolve NGOs included on the “foreign agents” register but unable or unwilling to comply with the additional reporting requirements or severe fines levelled against them.

Along with the criminal prosecutions of individuals for the peaceful exercise of their fundamental freedoms, these have all had a further chilling effect on civil society.

Now under its third periodic review, and as with its second review, Russia continues to refuse to accept any specific recommendations on amending or repealing these laws. Russia does this while accepting more vague and unspecific recommendations, such as “creating a safe and enabling environment for civil society and human rights defenders”.

It should be clear to all delegations that it is impossible to implement these kinds of recommendations without first removing existing repressive legislation on freedom of association and assembly. So, by not accepting these recommendations Russia sends a clear signal that it is not willing to do anything to meet its international obligations on freedom of association and assembly and the protection of human rights defenders.

Mr Chairperson, we ask the Russian Federation to:

  1. Repeal the provisions on “foreign agents” NGOs and repeal the law on “undesirable organizations”;
  2. Stop arbitrary detentions and criminal prosecution of participants of peaceful protests and repeal restrictive legislation in relation to peaceful assembly.

Thank you.

 

This statement also enjoys the support of the following organisations:

  • OVD-Info
  • Youth Human Rights Movement

Latest

July 16, 2019

HRC41: Joint NGO end of session statement

Some 16 human rights organisations, including Human Rights House Foundation, issued a joint statement on 12 July 2019, responding to the outcomes of the 41st session of the UN Human Rights Council.

July 11, 2019

HRC41: Concern about recent handling of protests in Georgia

On 11 July 2019, Human Rights House Foundation delivered a statement at the Human Rights Council expressing concern at the recent handling of peaceful protests in Georgia.

July 10, 2019

HRC41: Freedom of Expression in Crimea

In a statement to the UN Human Rights Council (HRC41) on 10 July 2019, HRHF focused on freedom expression in Crimea which has deteriorated since the beginning of the Russian occupation of the peninsula.