A year after the Saffron Revolution and just weeks before UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon’s planned visit, freedom of expression in Burma has reached a historical low point with the sentencing of a comedian to 45 years and the imprisonment of journalists, lawyers, poets and activists. ARTICLE 19 and Index on Censorship are immensely saddened by the plummeting situation in Burma and are concerned by the evident chain of events which systematically undermine human rights and freedom of expression.
Worrying developments
A number of worrying incidents have taken place recently, including:
September 2008: Since September, Burmese news sites Mizzima and Irrawaddy have been targeted with electronic attacks and have had their servers bombarded with denial-of-service attacks;
October 2008: Two judges involved in cases arising from last year’s protests, Nyi Nyi Htwe and Saw Kyaw Kyaw Min, were sentenced to six months in jail on 29 October under Section 228 of the Penal Code for requesting that the Information Minister and Director General of police be called as witnesses for their three clients;
November 2008: New political detainees including Htwe and Min were moved to prisons located far away from their families, making it difficult for their families to support them, and bring them food and medicine;
7 November 2008: Supreme Court advocates U Aung Thein and U Khin Maung Shein involved in the cases of protesters were convicted to four-month prison terms for contempt of court under Section 3 of the 1926 Contempt of Courts Act after submitting a letter to the court that called into question the fairness of the entire judicial process;
11 November 2008: The infamous Insein prison special court in Rangoon sentenced fourteen leading democracy activists, all members of the ’88 Generation Student group, to 65 years’ imprisonment each;
Nay Phone Latt, a pro-democracy blogger, was handed down a 20-year prison sentence for posting on his website material that criticised military leader Than She. His lawyer was also put behind bars for criticising the special court’s procedures;
Labour activist Su Su Nwe was sentenced to 12 and a half years’ imprisonment, and poet Saw Wai was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment for a hidden anti-Than She message in one of his poems;
Musician Win Maw, arrested on 27 November 2007, was charged under Article 5(j) of the penal code with “threatening national security” and sentenced to six years in prison;
14 November 2008: Eco Vision journalist Ein Khaing Oo was given a two-year prison term for taking photographs of survivors of Cyclone Nargis;
18 November: Three activists from the ’88 Generation Students group were sentenced for up to 33 years’imprisonment for inciting public unrest under the Emergency Act;
Two Buddhist monks Ashin Gambira and U Kalatha were also sentenced to long prison terms of around 12 years for their part in leading the demonstrations of 2007
Five UN experts, including envoy Tomas Ojea Quintana, condemned the severe convictions and the unfair trials of prisoners of conscience
20 November: Following his father and grandfather who were sentenced on 11 November, Di Nyein Lin and two other student activists were sentenced to six and a half years’ imprisonment for causing public alarm and insulting religion;
21 November: Comedian Zarganar, arrested on 4 June for collecting money for Cyclone Nargis victims, was sentenced to a staggering 45 years for creating “disaffection towards state and government” and violating the Electronics Act. Zarganar also has another five cases remaining against him to be tried on 27 November;
Sports columnist Zaw Thet Htwe and co-accused Thant Zin Aung were sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment each, and Tin Maung Aye received 29 years in prison, all for their similar roles in the same cyclone relief efforts.
Awaiting Trial
There are many more cases lined up in this rapidly unfolding situation that include magazine editor Zaw Thet Htwe, human rights defender U Myint Aye and activist monk U Gambira. Over the last year, the number of political prisoners has leapt from 1,200 in 2007 to over 2,100 today. What was already an unfair and opaque legal system has deteriorated substantially and cases are now heard within prisons devoid of any form of openness and transparency.
Appeal to international community
ARTICLE 19 and Index on Censorship note that UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon has repeatedly declared that Burma is a key priority for the UN. We also note and express gratitude that the European Union, Japan and the United States have all released statements on the unfolding situation. Unfortunately, the states with the largest influence over the Burmese government — the People´s Republic of China, India and Thailand — have remained silent. ARTICLE 19 and Index on Censorship call upon the People´s Republic of China, India, Thailand and the ASEAN countries to raise these abuses with the Burmese government.
Furthermore, ARTICLE 19 and Index on Censorship call upon European Union member states, and in particular Nicolas Sarkozy in his capacity as President of the Council of the European Union and José Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission, to use the upcoming 11 th EU-China Summit in Lyon, France, to raise these issues with the Chinese government as part of their promised regional dialogue.