Amnesty International, Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Human Rights Watch, urged today in their letter, sent to the authorities of Bosnia and Herzegovina, to take appropriate steps to safeguard the fundamental rights of every person in Bosnia and Herzegovina subject to removal, including those whose citizenship is under review. (11-MAY-07)
This letter is made by the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Amnesty International and the Human Rights Watch, which has republicated here by HRH / Mirsad Pandzic.
Amnesty International, the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Human Rights Watch asked authorities to exercise their leadership to ensure that every person in Bosnia and Herzegovina subject to deportation, extradition or other removal is protected against return to countries where they would be at risk of serious human rights abuses, including torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (refoulement). The concern arises particularly in the context of the current process of reviewing the citizenship of naturalized citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina. In this respect, organizations that signed this letter, are concerned about recent public comments made by officials in Bosnia and Herzegovina encouraging individuals whose presence or citizenship is being reviewed to “voluntarily leave the country before they are deported.”
Ensure that existing remedies function properly
Based on concerns expressed by individuals subject to the citizenship review process, as well as past treatment of individuals deemed to be a threat to the security of Bosnia and Herzegovina, organizations urged to the authorities to ensure that existing remedies function properly and provide adequate safeguards against extrajudicial transfers and refoulement. They recalled the 2002 case of six men of Algerian origin handed over by the authorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina to the US military in the face of a determination by the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina Supreme Court that there was no basis for their detention, as well as an interim order by Human Rights Chamber of Bosnia and Herzegovina for provisional measures to prevent the deportation, expulsion or extradition of four of the men. The six men were subsequently transferred to the Guantánamo Bay detention facility. This case is documented in the June 2006 report by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe’s Special Rapporteur on “Alleged secret detentions and unlawful inter-state transfers involving Council of Europe member states” (AS/Jur (2006) 16 Part II).
ECHR
As the European Court of Human Rights has repeatedly affirmed, any transfer to a country where the individual concerned would be at risk of torture or inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment, is a violation of Article 3 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, to which Bosnia and Herzegovina became a state party on July 12, 2002.
Any procedure that puts a person at risk of deportation, extradition or other removal, including arising from the citizenship review process, should safeguard their human rights. Particularly, it is imperative to ensure that asylum procedures and existing domestic remedies in Bosnia and Herzegovina are sufficient to safeguard against the risk of torture or ill-treatment, or the application of the death penalty to individuals subject to removal.
To ensure that those subject to removal have access to an effective remedy against human rights violations, it is critically important that appeals against removal on human rights grounds have suspensive effect, in order to allow individuals to remain in Bosnia and Herzegovina while their appeal is being determined.
Diplomatic assurances
It is also imperative that the authorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina do not rely on diplomatic assurances to remove persons at risk of torture and other ill-treatment. Research by these organizations indicates that such assurances are an ineffective safeguard against torture and ill-treatment. Reliance upon diplomatic assurances circumvents the states’ obligations under the principle of non-refoulement undermining the absolute obligation not to return a person to a place where he or she is at risk of such human rights violations. That view is widely shared among international human rights experts including the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture, and the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights. Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in BH urged the authorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina not to seek or rely on such assurances where persons are at risk of torture or other ill-treatment.
Three organizations urged to the authorities of Bosnia and Herzegovina to take appropriate steps to safeguard the fundamental rights of every person in Bosnia and Herzegovina subject to removal, including those whose citizenship is under review.
This letter is sent to:
– Tarik Sadovic, Minister of Security, Bosnia and Herzegovina
– Nebojsa Radmanovic, Chairman of the Presidency, Bosnia and Herzegovina
– Haris Silajdzic, member of the Presidency, Bosnia and Herzegovina
– Zeljko Komsic, member of the Presidency, Bosnia and Herzegovina
– Nikola Spiric, Chairman of the Council of Ministers, Bosnia and Herzegovina
– Beriz Belkic, Chariman of the House of Representatives, Bosnia and Herzegovina
– Barisa Colak, Minister of Justice, Bosnia and Herzegovina
– Vjekoslav Vukovic, Chairman of the State Commission for the Revision of Decisions on Naturalization of Foreign Citizens
– Christian Schwarz-Schilling, High Representative, Office of the High Representative and EU Special Representative, Bosnia and Herzegovina
– Fiorenzo Stolfi, Chairman of the Committee of Ministers, Council of Europe
&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2F){kind=link}