United States

In the battle for the evangelical Christian conservative votes in the United States, the remaining candidates in the race to be nominated for the Republican presidential candidate are becoming increasingly clear on religious affiliation and religiously motivated political views. Questions about abortion, homosexuality and so-called Christian family values become central, well-defined issues. Former President Jimmy Carter is one of many who are now warning against excessive use of religion and religious symbols in the political nomination battle. In a rare interview, former US president J. Carter said that his fellow Georgian, Newt Gingrich, was employing a “subtlety of racism” that harked back to the time of segregation in the Deep South.  “I think he has that subtlety of racism that I know quite well, and that Gingrich knows quite well, that appeals to some people in Georgia – particularly the right wing“, he told Piers Morgan in an interview on CNN. The 87-year-old said he did not think Mr Gingrich himself was racist but that through his constant references to Barack Obama as a “food stamp president” and by continually linking of the black community to welfare payments he was making a coded appeal to bigots in the conservative state of South Carolina.

Middle East and Africa

In Nigeria, religion and religious identity is being exploited in order to strengthen regional and ethnic borders. Politicization of Islam through the introduction of sharia in several states in this declaredly secular republic has led to increased political tension and has triggered regional violent conflicts between Muslim and Christian groups. In Iran and Iraq there has been a shift from secular to Islamic constitutions. The Iranian Constitution, which states that all other legislation must be based on Islamic criteria, is the strictest. The Afghan Constitution of 2004, Article 2, states that “no law can be contrary to the teachings and laws of Islam.” This has weakened the position of human rights in the country´s legislation. It has limited the number of religions that are approved as a recognized religion and weakened freedom of expression and equality.

Egypt’s first democratic elections have given the Muslim parties an overwhelming majority in Parliament. What consequences this will have on the design of the new Egyptian constitution, remains to be seen. The country’s Coptic Christian minority is experiencing various forms of sectarian harassment, and fears increased discrimination including greater influence from radical Islamist parties. Many women fear the introduction of sharia, which will severely restrict their rights and freedoms. Author Nawal El Saadavi is among the most outspoken critics of the fact that the commission which has started to work on a proposed new constitution was formed without the participation of women.

South East Asia

Indian politicians like to describe their country as the world’s most populous democracy. But at the same time author Salman Rushdie was recently forced to withdraw from India’s largest literary festival in Jaipur in northwest India. Muslim extremists claimed that Rushdie’s expressions violate Islam and that criminals should be hired to eliminate the author. Again, Rushdie’s novel Satanic Verses from 1988 is being used to justify threats from Muslim activists and populist politicians. An Iranian fatwa from Ayatollah Khomeini in 1989 involved a death sentence for the author and all his translators and publishers. The fatwa still formally exists. Satanic Verses was banned in India shortly after its release and is still blacklisted. The ban came after pressure from Muslim populist politicians. The novel became a symbol for the strengthening of support among Muslim voters and led to pressure against PM Rajiv Gandhi and the Congress Party which was dependent on Muslim votes. Roughly 23 years later the Congress Party is back in power but chooses to silently let the threats from extremists set the agenda in the political power struggle.

Norwegian PEN warns against a trend in which religious-based politics, at both national and international levels, weakens freedom of expression and undermines basic human rights for individuals and groups. Norwegian PEN urges PEN International, the national PEN clubs, other human rights organizations and institutions, and national and international authors´-, journalists´- and publishers´ organizations to challenge a political development in which populist politicians abuse religious feelings and symbols in order to set groups up against each other, undermine the rights of individuals and groups and weaken freedom of expression.

Related Stories

One year since the closure of Azerbaijan Human Rights House
Human Rights: online and offline