Statements (full versions downloadable, right) from the two networks make it clear that the proposed amendments to the law  on non-governmental organizations contradict not only Azerbaijan’s own constitution, but also the country’s international obligations, in particular those made towards the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the commitments towards the European Union Eastern Partnership, the Council of Europe, and the OSCE.

The statements further list the numerous serious consequences of the proposed amendments, among them a ban on any and all activities for all NGOs until they have received their registration, a requirement of at least 50 % funding from local sources, and further restrictions on the possibilities for international organizations to operate in the country.

The undersigned organisations call upon the authorities of Azerbaijan to

  • promptly establish a dialogue with international and national actors affected by the draft amendments and for further liberalization of the existing NGO legislation and bringing it in line with the international obligations Azerbaijan has agreed to abide by
  • postpone consideration of the amendments to the law until the expertise from international organizations, including the Venice Commission, is obtained.

Documents:

  • South Caucasus Network of Human Rights Defenders
  • Human Rights House Network

    • Update: 19 June 2009

    During the extraordinary session of parliament held today, a packet of proposed amendments to the Azerbaijan Republic’s laws on Mass Media, Non-governmental Organizations, State Fees, and Donors and the Administrative Code was briefly discussed and then held for further discussion on 30 June. This packet of amendments, in its current form, has very serious implications for local and foreign NGOs operating in Azerbaijan, restricting their activities to the point that many NGOs’ believe they will be banned or only able to operate on an extremely limited scope.

    Source: Institute for Reporters’ Freedom and Safety, press release 19 June 2009 (http://www.irfs.az)